Supporting MIPI Camera with 8-bit and 16-bit Formats Using a Single Device Tree
Issue Overview
Users are experiencing difficulties configuring a custom MIPI camera to support both 8-bit and 16-bit per pixel imaging formats using a single device tree on the Nvidia Jetson Orin Nano Dev board. The 16-bit format requires 4 MIPI lanes, while the 8-bit format only needs two lanes. Currently, separate device trees are needed to capture both formats, as the "bus-width" parameter must be set to 4 for 4 lanes and 2 for 2 lanes. Users are seeking a solution to support both formats with a single device tree, either through programmatic means via the camera driver or by confining the format differences to the sensor "modes".
Possible Causes
-
Device Tree Configuration Limitations: The current device tree structure may not support dynamic lane configuration based on the pixel format.
-
Driver Inflexibility: The camera driver might not be designed to handle dynamic lane switching based on the selected pixel format.
-
Hardware Constraints: The MIPI interface on the Jetson Orin Nano Dev board may have limitations in dynamically switching between 2-lane and 4-lane configurations.
-
Sensor Mode Configuration: The sensor modes in the device tree might not be properly defined to accommodate both 8-bit and 16-bit formats with their respective lane requirements.
Troubleshooting Steps, Solutions & Fixes
-
Modify Sensor Modes:
- Define both 2-lane and 4-lane settings within different sensor modes in the device tree.
- Add the
use_sensor_mode_id
property to the device tree to enable mode-specific configurations. - Example command for mode selection:
v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video0 --set-fmt-video=width=1280,height=720,pixelformat=RG10 --set-ctrl bypass_mode=0 --set-ctrl sensor_mode=4 --stream-mmap --stream-count=100
-
Adjust Pixel Clock Rate:
- For the 8-bit format, consider revising it as a 4-lane setting by lowering the pixel clock rate. This approach may allow you to maintain a consistent 4-lane configuration in the device tree while supporting both 8-bit and 16-bit formats.
-
Investigate Driver Modifications:
- If the above solutions don’t work, consider modifying the camera driver to dynamically adjust the lane configuration based on the selected pixel format.
- This would require expertise in driver development and a deep understanding of the Jetson Orin Nano’s camera subsystem.
-
Review Port Definitions:
- Examine the port definitions in the device tree, particularly the
bus-width
parameter. - Current example of port definition:
tegra-capture-vi { num-channels = <2>; ports { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; vi_port0: port@0 { reg = <0>; custom_cam_vi_in0: endpoint { port-index = <1>; bus-width = <4>; remote-endpoint = <&custom_cam_csi_out0>; }; }; port@1 { reg = <1>; custom_cam_vi_in1: endpoint { port-index = <2>; bus-width = <4>; remote-endpoint = <&custom_cam_csi_out1>; }; }; }; };
- Investigate if it’s possible to make the
bus-width
parameter dynamic or mode-specific.
- Examine the port definitions in the device tree, particularly the
-
Consult Nvidia Documentation:
- Review the Jetson Linux Developer Guide, particularly the section on Device Properties, for any advanced configuration options that might help address this issue.
- Look for any application notes or errata related to MIPI camera configurations on the Jetson Orin Nano.
-
Community Support:
- If the issue persists, consider reaching out to the Nvidia Developer Forums or the Jetson community for more specialized assistance.
- Provide detailed information about your camera model, exact Jetson Orin Nano version, and the steps you’ve already taken to troubleshoot the problem.
-
Hardware Verification:
- Ensure that your custom MIPI camera is functioning correctly and that the issue is not caused by a hardware defect.
- Test the camera with other devices or development boards, if possible, to isolate whether the problem is specific to the Jetson Orin Nano configuration.